Orion Ascent 2026: AI, Fixed Income, and the Widening Technology Gap

Our booth backdrop was lost in a snowstorm somewhere on the East Coast. Tracking said delivered. The exhibit floor said otherwise. To make matters worse, the same storm delayed our team, so we arrived late to a booth with nothing in it. Once we got there, we improvised: a large-format TV from Walmart, supplies from Target, and enough determination to build something functional. It wasn’t pretty, but it stripped away the polish and left us with what actually matters at a conference: genuine conversations.

It also turned out to be a fitting setup for the conference theme itself: Relentless. Four days in San Diego, and the message from every stage, every breakout, every workshop pointed in the same direction. What matters isn’t the plan, but the capacity to execute when the plan fails. Here’s what we took home.

AI is being baked in, not bolted on

There was a version of the AI conversation at conferences two or three years ago that felt speculative. Demos, prototypes, a lot of “imagine if.” That version is gone. What Orion is shipping now (embedded AI across compliance, onboarding, client communication, and trade workflows) has moved well past add-on territory into core infrastructure. The pre-conference AI workshop ran four hours and was packed, not with advisors trying to understand what AI is, but with advisors figuring out how to deploy it in their practice by next quarter.

The implication is real: firms that treat AI as something to evaluate later are already behind firms that are treating it as something to operationalize now. The gap is widening at a pace that makes “we’re monitoring the space” a dangerous posture.

Behavioral finance has moved from buzzword to business strategy

Dr. Daniel Crosby appeared both on the main stage and led a half-day pre-conference academy. That’s not a coincidence. Orion is signaling that understanding client psychology isn’t a soft skill reserved for a certain type of advisor, but a retention strategy, a differentiation strategy, and increasingly a technology-enabled capability. The advisors who will weather volatility, political uncertainty, and market dislocations are the ones whose clients feel genuinely understood, not just well-allocated.

What struck us was how naturally this connects to what the best fixed income managers already know: client behavior during a drawdown matters more than duration positioning. You can have the right portfolio and still lose the relationship if the communication fails.

The firms that know their numbers are building something sellable

The KPI Playbook session and the trade desk scaling panel shared a throughline that didn’t announce itself loudly but was hard to miss: operational discipline is equity. Firms that know their metrics (AUM per advisor, revenue per client, trade error rates, workflow completion rates) aren’t just running tighter businesses. They’re building something that a buyer can underwrite. As consolidation continues across the RIA and asset management landscape, the firms that can tell a clean operational story command better multiples and better terms. The ones that can’t are leaving value on the table whether they plan to sell or not.

Fixed income is having a moment, and most platforms aren’t ready for it

Falling interest rates dominated the fixed income session, and the conversation was pointed: portfolios built for a rising rate environment don’t automatically unwind cleanly when the cycle turns. Duration has to be actively managed. Credit quality positioning needs to be revisited. Income replacement strategy for clients who built ladders at peak rates requires real thought, not a generic rebalance.

This is where the tooling conversation gets uncomfortable. General-purpose platforms can handle the surface-level mechanics. But the precision that falling rates demand (tax lot sensitivity, benchmark-aware repositioning, SMA-level compliance rule enforcement) requires infrastructure that was designed for fixed income from the ground up, not adapted to it after the fact. That distinction matters more now than it did 18 months ago.

This connects directly to what Natalie Wolfsen, Orion’s CEO, highlighted in her main stage presentation comparing Andy Warhol’s Factory to Roy Lichtenstein’s hand-painted Ben-Day dots. For decades, fixed income portfolio management has operated like Lichtenstein: portfolio managers hand-crafting allocations, manually screening securities, layering constraints one by one across hundreds or thousands of accounts. The craft is real, and the judgment required to navigate credit risk, duration, tax efficiency, and yield is genuinely sophisticated. But that level of precision doesn’t scale when you’re managing billions across multiple strategies and SMA accounts.

What we need isn’t less artistry, but automation of the mechanical parts so portfolio managers can focus on what actually requires human judgment. Let the technology handle the reproduction, the grid, the prep work, the precision, while your team focuses on strategy, conviction, and risk management.

Warhol didn’t become less of an artist when he built the Factory. He became more prolific, more influential, and more valuable. The bond market is ready for its Factory moment, especially as falling rates create urgent repositioning requirements.

Technology adoption is the bottleneck, not technology capability

Almost every platform session at Ascent (Advisor Portal, Redtail, Eclipse, Orion Mobile) carried the same quiet acknowledgment underneath the feature showcases: most advisors aren’t using what they already have. Orion has invested heavily in building capability, and the variable they’re now working hardest on is closing the gap between what the platform can do and what the average user actually does with it. The tailored agendas by role, the hands-on workshops, the pre-conference deep dives all reflect a vendor that understands deployment is the real product problem to solve.

For any firm evaluating new technology: the first audit should be of your current stack, not the next vendor’s demo.

The bigger question: when the platform catches up, what happens to the workaround?

One of the more thought-provoking threads running through Ascent this year wasn’t on any session agenda. It was a question about what separates what an institutionalized platform vendor builds over years of enterprise investment from what an individual, a startup, or an internal team builds with good intentions and a limited runway.

Our Head of Sales, Blake Lynch, spent a lot of time thinking about this during and after the conference. His take: the gap between enterprise platforms and the boutique tools that advisors rely on isn’t narrowing. It’s widening, and the implications for how firms make technology decisions are significant.

He digs into the “side project app” problem, the fixed income parallel, and what sustained R&D velocity means for technology buyers in his full article on LinkedIn.

The short version: a side project app solves yesterday’s problem. An institutionalized platform is built to anticipate tomorrow’s workflow. That framing should inform every technology evaluation.

Final thought

The most relentless thing an advisor, or technology buyer, can do is resist the comfort of familiar tools when better-designed, institutionally built alternatives exist. Orion Ascent 2026 was a four-day demonstration of what that looks like when a vendor takes that standard seriously.

The lesson from Natalie Wolfsen’s comparison of Warhol and Lichtenstein applies beyond fixed income portfolio management. It applies to every technology decision an advisor makes: the medium changes, but the intelligence behind the work doesn’t. The tool serves the idea. The firms that understand this, that let technology handle volume, precision, and reproducibility so they can focus on the choices that actually matter, will outperform not just in execution but in the depth of value they deliver to clients.

IMTC & Orion: a partnership built for fixed income

IMTC is proud to be a partner to Orion, and specifically proud of the role we play in bolstering Orion’s fixed income capabilities for the firms they serve. As Orion continues to build out the most comprehensive advisor technology ecosystem in the industry, IMTC brings the purpose-built fixed income infrastructure that makes that ecosystem complete for asset managers, RIAs, and SMA managers running bond portfolios at scale.

Purpose-built isn’t a marketing phrase for us. It’s an engineering decision made over a decade of working exclusively within fixed income: tax lot management, duration targeting, benchmark-aware compliance, SMA-level order management, all of it designed from the ground up for how bonds actually work rather than adapted or approximated after the fact.

If you’re an Orion firm expanding your fixed income SMA capabilities, or looking to scale an existing program, we’d welcome the conversation.

This paper is intended for information and discussion purposes only. The information contained in this publication is derived from data obtained from sources believed by IMTC to be reliable and is given in good faith, but no guarantees are made by IMTC with regard to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of the information presented. Nothing within this paper should be relied upon as investment advice, and nothing within shall confer rights or remedies upon, you or any of your employees, creditors, holders of securities or other equity holders or any other person. Any opinions expressed reflect the current judgment of the authors of this paper and do not necessarily represent the opinion of IMTC. IMTC expressly disclaims all representations and warranties, express, implied, statutory or otherwise, whatsoever, including, but not limited to: (i) warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, suitability, usage, title, or noninfringement; (ii) that the contents of this white paper are free from error; and (iii) that such contents will not infringe third-party rights. The information contained within this paper is the intellectual property of IMTC and any further dissemination of this paper should attribute rights to IMTC and include this disclaimer.